Required Reading
What is the evidence for evolution? A court's answer
Kitzmiller v.
Dover Area School Dist. 400 F.Supp.2d 707 M.D. Pa. 2005.
Pay particular attention to the section
entitled
"4. Whether ID is Science" up to but not including "F.
Application of the Lemon test to the ID policy."
This is a detailed scientific
critique of intelligent design. Although we will focus on the scientific
critique
of intelligent design, we will also look at the legal arguments against teaching
intelligent
design in public schools. See "3. Whether an objective
Dover citizen should perceive
defendants' conduct to be an endorsement
of religion" and "F. Application of the Lemon test to the ID policy."
Just look at the conclusions and main arguments, and do not read in detail
the chronology presented in part F.
of the opinion.
Popular summaries of evidence for evolution
National Geographic Society
A fin is a wing is a limb
Musseling in
on evolution
Intelligent design
Meyer, S.C. 2004
Intelligent design: The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories.
Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 117: 213-239. This article
is long, and I certainly do not expect you to read it
line by line. It is notable because it is one of the few articles on intelligent design
published in a peer review scientific journal.
Questions for class discussion
1. We will work through the court's analysis in Kitzmiller as to whether intelligent design
is science.
2. What is intelligent design? What is the key evidence cited by its supporters?
3. Suppose you were given a copy of Meyer's paper, but did not have any access to
the scientific literature. How would you go about evaluating whether the claims that Meyer
makes are correct or not? This question is surprisingly difficult, and also important. Not infrequently
attorneys must evaluate the quality of scientific information, but do not have
the time or money needed for a thorough investigation. Restated, how can you get
to the bottom line as to whether a scientific paper is reliable, without expending more
effort on your analysis than is absolutely necessary?
4. What is the line between science, philosophy and psychology? Consider
Buddism. The Dali Lama has, for
example, recently
encouraged Buddist monks to cooperate with neurobiologists interested in studying
meditation, and has himself spoken at national meetings of neurobiologists.
Could the results of this scientific research be taught in public schools
without violating the establishment clause? Work through the Lemon test with this
set of facts. Why should Buddism be allowed in a science curriculum, but not intelligent
design? Or should both be prohibited?